Waiting for Godot: Anticipating answers on embolic protection unlikely to arrive

Khalil Anouti; William A. Gray

doi:10.1002/ccd.27879

Waiting for Godot: Anticipating answers on embolic protection unlikely to arrive

Khalil Anouti, William A. Gray

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

For symptomatic and asymptomatic patient with high or intermediate risk of CEA complications, CAS with the use of EPDs has a very low rate of in-hospital stroke and death There is no statistically significant difference in ipsilateral stroke/TIA and any stroke/TIA between the different device platforms Further efforts to assess differences between EPD devices would likely need to involve a surrogate endpoint due to the very low rates of clinical events.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	750-751
Number of pages	2
Journal	Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume	92
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27879
State	Published - Oct 1 2018
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Access to Document

10.1002/ccd.27879

Cite this

@article{0003cb5b527645ca956a3669a9239d55,

title = "Waiting for Godot: Anticipating answers on embolic protection unlikely to arrive",

abstract = "For symptomatic and asymptomatic patient with high or intermediate risk of CEA complications, CAS with the use of EPDs has a very low rate of in-hospital stroke and death There is no statistically significant difference in ipsilateral stroke/TIA and any stroke/TIA between the different device platforms Further efforts to assess differences between EPD devices would likely need to involve a surrogate endpoint due to the very low rates of clinical events.",

author = "Khalil Anouti and Gray, {William A.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.",

year = "2018",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1002/ccd.27879",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "92",

pages = "750--751",

journal = "Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions",

issn = "1522-1946",

publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Waiting for Godot

T2 - Anticipating answers on embolic protection unlikely to arrive

AU - Anouti, Khalil

AU - Gray, William A.

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - For symptomatic and asymptomatic patient with high or intermediate risk of CEA complications, CAS with the use of EPDs has a very low rate of in-hospital stroke and death There is no statistically significant difference in ipsilateral stroke/TIA and any stroke/TIA between the different device platforms Further efforts to assess differences between EPD devices would likely need to involve a surrogate endpoint due to the very low rates of clinical events.

AB - For symptomatic and asymptomatic patient with high or intermediate risk of CEA complications, CAS with the use of EPDs has a very low rate of in-hospital stroke and death There is no statistically significant difference in ipsilateral stroke/TIA and any stroke/TIA between the different device platforms Further efforts to assess differences between EPD devices would likely need to involve a surrogate endpoint due to the very low rates of clinical events.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055077853&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055077853&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ccd.27879

DO - 10.1002/ccd.27879

M3 - Editorial

C2 - 30341824

AN - SCOPUS:85055077853

SN - 1522-1946

VL - 92

SP - 750

EP - 751

JO - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

JF - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

IS - 4

ER -

Waiting for Godot: Anticipating answers on embolic protection unlikely to arrive

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this