What have the difference scores not been telling us? a critique of the use of self-ideal discrepancy in the assessment of body image and evaluation of an alternative data-analytic framework

Guy Cafri, Patricia van den Berg, Michael T. Brannick

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    29 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Difference scores are often used as a means of assessing body image satisfaction using silhouette scales. Unfortunately, difference scores suffer from numerous potential methodological problems, including reduced reliability, ambiguity, confounded effects, untested constraints, and dimensional reduction. In this article, the methodological problems are outlined and an alternative framework is discussed. The alternative consists of a minimum of testing the constraints implied by the difference score model, and at most evaluating more exact body image hypotheses by incorporating nonlinear terms in a regression and testing features of the response surface. Two empirical examples are used to illustrate the utility of these methods. The first example uses both polynomial regression and response surface methods to examine eating disorder outcomes, whereas the second example uses polynomial regression to examine the outcomes related to muscle dysmorphia. Directions for future research related to assessment of body image are discussed.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)361-376
    Number of pages16
    JournalAssessment
    Volume17
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2010

    Fingerprint

    Body Image
    Muscles

    Keywords

    • Assessment
    • Body image
    • Difference scores
    • Silhouette scales

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Applied Psychology
    • Clinical Psychology

    Cite this

    What have the difference scores not been telling us? a critique of the use of self-ideal discrepancy in the assessment of body image and evaluation of an alternative data-analytic framework. / Cafri, Guy; van den Berg, Patricia; Brannick, Michael T.

    In: Assessment, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2010, p. 361-376.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{3b67140ff44940758b496d5096387ccc,
    title = "What have the difference scores not been telling us? a critique of the use of self-ideal discrepancy in the assessment of body image and evaluation of an alternative data-analytic framework",
    abstract = "Difference scores are often used as a means of assessing body image satisfaction using silhouette scales. Unfortunately, difference scores suffer from numerous potential methodological problems, including reduced reliability, ambiguity, confounded effects, untested constraints, and dimensional reduction. In this article, the methodological problems are outlined and an alternative framework is discussed. The alternative consists of a minimum of testing the constraints implied by the difference score model, and at most evaluating more exact body image hypotheses by incorporating nonlinear terms in a regression and testing features of the response surface. Two empirical examples are used to illustrate the utility of these methods. The first example uses both polynomial regression and response surface methods to examine eating disorder outcomes, whereas the second example uses polynomial regression to examine the outcomes related to muscle dysmorphia. Directions for future research related to assessment of body image are discussed.",
    keywords = "Assessment, Body image, Difference scores, Silhouette scales",
    author = "Guy Cafri and {van den Berg}, Patricia and Brannick, {Michael T.}",
    year = "2010",
    doi = "10.1177/1073191109357028",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "17",
    pages = "361--376",
    journal = "Assessment",
    issn = "1073-1911",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - What have the difference scores not been telling us? a critique of the use of self-ideal discrepancy in the assessment of body image and evaluation of an alternative data-analytic framework

    AU - Cafri, Guy

    AU - van den Berg, Patricia

    AU - Brannick, Michael T.

    PY - 2010

    Y1 - 2010

    N2 - Difference scores are often used as a means of assessing body image satisfaction using silhouette scales. Unfortunately, difference scores suffer from numerous potential methodological problems, including reduced reliability, ambiguity, confounded effects, untested constraints, and dimensional reduction. In this article, the methodological problems are outlined and an alternative framework is discussed. The alternative consists of a minimum of testing the constraints implied by the difference score model, and at most evaluating more exact body image hypotheses by incorporating nonlinear terms in a regression and testing features of the response surface. Two empirical examples are used to illustrate the utility of these methods. The first example uses both polynomial regression and response surface methods to examine eating disorder outcomes, whereas the second example uses polynomial regression to examine the outcomes related to muscle dysmorphia. Directions for future research related to assessment of body image are discussed.

    AB - Difference scores are often used as a means of assessing body image satisfaction using silhouette scales. Unfortunately, difference scores suffer from numerous potential methodological problems, including reduced reliability, ambiguity, confounded effects, untested constraints, and dimensional reduction. In this article, the methodological problems are outlined and an alternative framework is discussed. The alternative consists of a minimum of testing the constraints implied by the difference score model, and at most evaluating more exact body image hypotheses by incorporating nonlinear terms in a regression and testing features of the response surface. Two empirical examples are used to illustrate the utility of these methods. The first example uses both polynomial regression and response surface methods to examine eating disorder outcomes, whereas the second example uses polynomial regression to examine the outcomes related to muscle dysmorphia. Directions for future research related to assessment of body image are discussed.

    KW - Assessment

    KW - Body image

    KW - Difference scores

    KW - Silhouette scales

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955258993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955258993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/1073191109357028

    DO - 10.1177/1073191109357028

    M3 - Article

    VL - 17

    SP - 361

    EP - 376

    JO - Assessment

    JF - Assessment

    SN - 1073-1911

    IS - 3

    ER -