What we have learned about the design of randomized trials in pregnancy

Elizabeth A. Thom, Madeline Murguia Rice, George Saade, Uma M. Reddy

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

For nearly 30 years the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network has been conducting randomized trials in pregnant women, many of which have changed clinical practice. Since 1986, the MFMU Network has conducted 29 randomized trials, of which the 17 trials started or completed since 2003 are described here. Study design choices are described including decisions regarding the fundamental questions to be answered and the rationale behind choices of primary and secondary outcomes. Some of the potential pitfalls, particularly relating to bias, that can affect the interpretation of trial results are described along with the mechanisms that the Network has used to avoid or minimize them.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)328-334
Number of pages7
JournalSeminars in Perinatology
Volume40
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

Fingerprint

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.)
Medicine
Pregnancy
Pregnant Women

Keywords

  • bias
  • primary outcome
  • randomized trial
  • study design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

What we have learned about the design of randomized trials in pregnancy. / Thom, Elizabeth A.; Rice, Madeline Murguia; Saade, George; Reddy, Uma M.

In: Seminars in Perinatology, Vol. 40, No. 5, 01.08.2016, p. 328-334.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Thom, Elizabeth A. ; Rice, Madeline Murguia ; Saade, George ; Reddy, Uma M. / What we have learned about the design of randomized trials in pregnancy. In: Seminars in Perinatology. 2016 ; Vol. 40, No. 5. pp. 328-334.
@article{7015cfb3028c45dbb04c0e5696cd54e2,
title = "What we have learned about the design of randomized trials in pregnancy",
abstract = "For nearly 30 years the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network has been conducting randomized trials in pregnant women, many of which have changed clinical practice. Since 1986, the MFMU Network has conducted 29 randomized trials, of which the 17 trials started or completed since 2003 are described here. Study design choices are described including decisions regarding the fundamental questions to be answered and the rationale behind choices of primary and secondary outcomes. Some of the potential pitfalls, particularly relating to bias, that can affect the interpretation of trial results are described along with the mechanisms that the Network has used to avoid or minimize them.",
keywords = "bias, primary outcome, randomized trial, study design",
author = "Thom, {Elizabeth A.} and Rice, {Madeline Murguia} and George Saade and Reddy, {Uma M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1053/j.semperi.2016.03.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "328--334",
journal = "Seminars in Perinatology",
issn = "0146-0005",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What we have learned about the design of randomized trials in pregnancy

AU - Thom, Elizabeth A.

AU - Rice, Madeline Murguia

AU - Saade, George

AU - Reddy, Uma M.

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - For nearly 30 years the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network has been conducting randomized trials in pregnant women, many of which have changed clinical practice. Since 1986, the MFMU Network has conducted 29 randomized trials, of which the 17 trials started or completed since 2003 are described here. Study design choices are described including decisions regarding the fundamental questions to be answered and the rationale behind choices of primary and secondary outcomes. Some of the potential pitfalls, particularly relating to bias, that can affect the interpretation of trial results are described along with the mechanisms that the Network has used to avoid or minimize them.

AB - For nearly 30 years the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network has been conducting randomized trials in pregnant women, many of which have changed clinical practice. Since 1986, the MFMU Network has conducted 29 randomized trials, of which the 17 trials started or completed since 2003 are described here. Study design choices are described including decisions regarding the fundamental questions to be answered and the rationale behind choices of primary and secondary outcomes. Some of the potential pitfalls, particularly relating to bias, that can affect the interpretation of trial results are described along with the mechanisms that the Network has used to avoid or minimize them.

KW - bias

KW - primary outcome

KW - randomized trial

KW - study design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990876690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84990876690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/j.semperi.2016.03.011

DO - 10.1053/j.semperi.2016.03.011

M3 - Review article

C2 - 27344190

AN - SCOPUS:84990876690

VL - 40

SP - 328

EP - 334

JO - Seminars in Perinatology

JF - Seminars in Perinatology

SN - 0146-0005

IS - 5

ER -