Why Teach Literature and Medicine? Answers from Three Decades

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this essay, I look back at some of the earliest attempts by the first generation of literature-and-medicine scholars to answer the question: Why teach literature and medicine? Reviewing the development of the field in its early years, I examine statements by practitioners to see whether their answers have held up over time and to consider how the rationales they articulated have expanded or changed in the following years and why. Greater emphasis on literary criticism, narrative ethics, narrative theory, and reflective writing has influenced current work in the field in ways that could not have been foreseen in the 1970s. The extraordinary growth of interest and work in the field nationally and, especially since 1996, internationally has included practitioners in many additional areas such as disability studies, film studies, therapeutic writing, and trauma studies. Along with the emergence of narrative medicine, this diverse community of scholars and practitioners-affiliated more through their use of narrative methodologies than the teaching of literature-makes the perennial challenge of evaluation and assessment even more complicated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)415-428
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Medical Humanities
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Narration
Medicine
medicine
narrative
Teaching
disability studies
literary criticism
Wounds and Injuries
first generation
Growth
trauma
moral philosophy
literature
methodology
Therapeutics
evaluation
community

Keywords

  • Literature and medicine
  • Medical education
  • Medical ethics
  • Medical humanities
  • Moral inquiry
  • Narrative ethics
  • Narrative medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Why Teach Literature and Medicine? Answers from Three Decades. / Jones, Anne.

In: Journal of Medical Humanities, Vol. 34, No. 4, 12.2013, p. 415-428.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{25457094fc8f41e3b1872990eb93ea32,
title = "Why Teach Literature and Medicine? Answers from Three Decades",
abstract = "In this essay, I look back at some of the earliest attempts by the first generation of literature-and-medicine scholars to answer the question: Why teach literature and medicine? Reviewing the development of the field in its early years, I examine statements by practitioners to see whether their answers have held up over time and to consider how the rationales they articulated have expanded or changed in the following years and why. Greater emphasis on literary criticism, narrative ethics, narrative theory, and reflective writing has influenced current work in the field in ways that could not have been foreseen in the 1970s. The extraordinary growth of interest and work in the field nationally and, especially since 1996, internationally has included practitioners in many additional areas such as disability studies, film studies, therapeutic writing, and trauma studies. Along with the emergence of narrative medicine, this diverse community of scholars and practitioners-affiliated more through their use of narrative methodologies than the teaching of literature-makes the perennial challenge of evaluation and assessment even more complicated.",
keywords = "Literature and medicine, Medical education, Medical ethics, Medical humanities, Moral inquiry, Narrative ethics, Narrative medicine",
author = "Anne Jones",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s10912-013-9241-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "415--428",
journal = "The Journal of Bioethics",
issn = "0278-9523",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why Teach Literature and Medicine? Answers from Three Decades

AU - Jones, Anne

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - In this essay, I look back at some of the earliest attempts by the first generation of literature-and-medicine scholars to answer the question: Why teach literature and medicine? Reviewing the development of the field in its early years, I examine statements by practitioners to see whether their answers have held up over time and to consider how the rationales they articulated have expanded or changed in the following years and why. Greater emphasis on literary criticism, narrative ethics, narrative theory, and reflective writing has influenced current work in the field in ways that could not have been foreseen in the 1970s. The extraordinary growth of interest and work in the field nationally and, especially since 1996, internationally has included practitioners in many additional areas such as disability studies, film studies, therapeutic writing, and trauma studies. Along with the emergence of narrative medicine, this diverse community of scholars and practitioners-affiliated more through their use of narrative methodologies than the teaching of literature-makes the perennial challenge of evaluation and assessment even more complicated.

AB - In this essay, I look back at some of the earliest attempts by the first generation of literature-and-medicine scholars to answer the question: Why teach literature and medicine? Reviewing the development of the field in its early years, I examine statements by practitioners to see whether their answers have held up over time and to consider how the rationales they articulated have expanded or changed in the following years and why. Greater emphasis on literary criticism, narrative ethics, narrative theory, and reflective writing has influenced current work in the field in ways that could not have been foreseen in the 1970s. The extraordinary growth of interest and work in the field nationally and, especially since 1996, internationally has included practitioners in many additional areas such as disability studies, film studies, therapeutic writing, and trauma studies. Along with the emergence of narrative medicine, this diverse community of scholars and practitioners-affiliated more through their use of narrative methodologies than the teaching of literature-makes the perennial challenge of evaluation and assessment even more complicated.

KW - Literature and medicine

KW - Medical education

KW - Medical ethics

KW - Medical humanities

KW - Moral inquiry

KW - Narrative ethics

KW - Narrative medicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887317264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887317264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10912-013-9241-9

DO - 10.1007/s10912-013-9241-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 23996053

AN - SCOPUS:84887317264

VL - 34

SP - 415

EP - 428

JO - The Journal of Bioethics

JF - The Journal of Bioethics

SN - 0278-9523

IS - 4

ER -